Boy am I glad the NBA playoffs are over.
Besides the fact that basketball referees have far too much control over the outcome of games (a fact to which I’m positive
Antoine Wright will attest) and, thus, just about every contest during the playoffs ends up in some sort of officiating controversy (which is off-putting enough), this year’s Championship carried a double annoyance: the Lakers had heavy expectations upon them.
Last year, when I lived in the Bay Area, I didn’t mind the Lakers much. I only had one friend up there who was a fan, and given his general embodiment of all that I have come to find so frustrating about Lakers fans (he actually believed Kobe Bryant
jumped over a speeding car), it was completely worth hearing him run his mouth for months when I got to see his spirit crushed in the Finals by the Celtics, firsthand. However, now that I find myself living in LA again, it’s impossible to escape the ubiquity of the Purple and Gold.
So why am I so glad to be done with it all? Why am I tired of the Los Angeles Lakers? Well, it’s a three pronged attack; I don’t inherently hate the Lakers, I just hate their fans, the media that covers them, and I don’t find their players or management particularly likeable. This is unfortunate, as I realize that, in witnessing Phil Jackson and Kobe Bryant’s tenth and fourth titles, respectively, I am witnessing history in the making, a cliché I feel comfortable using in this instance.
Unfortunately, I just couldn’t bring myself to root for this bunch, and admittedly would have loved to have observed the ensuing shitstorm had the Lakers actually managed to lose to the Houston Rockets in the Conference Semifinals.
Let’s start with the fans, for whom I feel so little empathy I have thoroughly enjoyed every low they’ve put themselves through on the imaginary roller coaster they’ve made out of the Lakers’ season. With the aforementioned exception of the Houston series, there has never been any reason to doubt that the team would again represent the Western Conference in the NBA Finals. They came into the year as the defending champions, and ended up winning the West by 11 games. But despite that dominance, every one of their 17 regular season losses was a chance to question the team’s effort, or call them ‘soft’.
As if they could win them all?
I’m tired of the Lakers flags that adorn SUVs likely belonging to people who never watched a game during the regular season. I’m tired of the fact that people care enough about Laker hating to actually steal those flags off cars. Feel free to point out the hypocrisy of spending 1,200 words hating on LA, but when my lifelong favorite sports team, The Angels, won their championship in 2002, I didn’t burn down the RVs parked outside Angel Stadium.
Let’s move on to the media, who have done nothing but pander to the Chicken Little attitude that has followed the team all season. While I understand that it isn’t exactly exciting to print articles praising a team, and that reader interest in sports journalism largely relies upon controversy, this past Lakers’ season was a particularly egregious example of such an attitude. Suffice to say, I find it mystifying that the local media could so ferociously and tenaciously deconstruct a basketball team that went 65-17, by far the best mark in the conference, and only a game short of best in the league.
As recently as June 7, just a couple days after the Lakers throttled the Orlando Magic 100-75, LA Times columnist Bill Plaschke (the blowhard of all blowhards, who I still can’t believe actually had the gall to
argue against erecting the Oscar De La Hoya statue outside of Staples Center) was
still questioning the team's effort and attitude, despite the fact they were coming off a resilient series victory in the Conference Finals over the Denver Nuggets, and had truly dominated the Magic in game one of the Finals. While, again, I realize that it is impossible to completely silence the critics (except when critics have the advantage of hindsight), I still find it hard to believe that any team in any sport that has performed so well has been criticized so frequently.
All that being said, I will admit the Lakers are an easy bunch to take shots at. When your team has an icon like Jack Nicholson perpetually sitting courtside (and who behaves as if he believes himself to be a fourth bench coach) it evokes ridicule. That ridicule may be borne out of jealousy, but that seems like a perfectly valid excuse to poke fun, in and of itself. But really, have you ever been to the Staples Center? The building’s concourses more resemble upscale cocktail bars than a sports venue.
Moving on to something more tangible, for all the greatness that Phil Jackson has exhibited over his career, he will never be beloved the way that Red Auerbach or John Wooden are. This is partially a symptom of his very philosophy, as his stoic attitude has never served an image as an ‘Uncle Phil’ persona. It is also a valid criticism that he has been somewhat opportunistic, inheriting great casts in both of his coaching gigs.
However, it also completely true that Phil Jackson is the greatest coach in NBA history. In a game that, in this day and age, is so much more about managing players’ egos than x’s and o’s, sustained success is so much more rare, which makes the fact that Jackson has broken Auerbach’s record of 9 Championships as a coach all the more impressive. Successfully managing Kobe and Shaq, and Dennis Rodman and, well, anyone he played with, is an impressive feat. This is why it’s a shame that Jackson is not more likable.
The exact same thing can be said for Kobe Bryant. Let’s not dismiss the fact that he may or may not have raped a girl (and at the very least, very publicly cheated on his wife), as this incident -- despite the fact that Lakers fans will decry this opinion -- has forever tainted his image in the court of public opinion. Moreover, he does share culpability with Shaquille O’Neal for breaking up one of the greatest duos in the history of the sport, and after doing that shares a much larger part of the blame for originally running Phil Jackson out of town.
However, what bothers me the most about Kobe Bryant and his legacy, however great, are its comparisons to Michael Jordan’s. This, going back, is probably the fault of the media, but it is astounding how many articles have been written comparing the two and their careers. Despite how many championships Bryant wins, this is absurd.
Everyone knows this is absurd. When all is said and done, I am confident Bryant will not have anywhere near five MVP awards or ten scoring titles. Kobe’s career may be great, but Jordan’s will have been greater.
I will grant that there are some good stories surrounding the team. If you know anything about
Derek Fisher's family's plight, then you have every reason to root for him. But ultimately, everyone outside LA knows that the Lakers serve the same purpose in the NBA that the Yankees or Cowboys do in their respective leagues: people love to see these teams fail. Despite the fact that I follow the Lakers far more closely than any other basketball team, count me in as one of those who love to hate on LA. The team’s early century three-peat -- featuring great rivalries with the Spurs and Kings and the rare combined greatness of O’Neal and Bryant -- were easier teams to root for.
This year, however, I’m just glad it’s all over.